Jump to content

Rasmus Ristolainen, the myth has finally been broken


LGR4GM

Recommended Posts

For YEARS there was a lot of talk on this very board about how even though most advanced metrics said he was awful, Ristolainen still was pretty decent and his tough and assist driven play actually benefitted this team. I think by the time of his trade most if not all were over him, so to speak, but never the less the myth that Ristolainen was good/useful as a defender seemed to persist. It boggled my mind for years that I had to have raging debates over Sam Reinhart where Risto was just "good" and a lot of it came back to his ability to hit things now and again. 

After the trade Philly, who I think felt invested, signed him to a 5year, 5.1mil per year extension. He is in the first year of that deal. Since a lot of ppl like to crap on the analytics lets not even use them here. I said the myth of Risto has been broken, that he was a useful top 4 defender who produced points despite his defensive short comings. Well, right now after 728minutes of TOI he has 0 points. That's right Craig Anderson has produced more offense than Risto to this point so I think the myth that he is good can finally be put to rest. He was mediocre while here and now I think he's below replacement level. 

So what has Adams done? He managed to trade Ristolainen and got a 1st round pick for him. Also, if torts is so good as a coach, why is Risto even worse than before? 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thanks (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

His tale is an object lesson in the usefulness of analytics over bromides like "but he gets points" and "but he hits people."  Points and hits are not useless, but the can be overwhelmed by other factors in evaluating a player.

I have always wondered how much Ristolainen, Zadorov, and Girgensons were hurt by The Tank.  They were better than guys on the Sabres at the time, so Nolan felt he needed them on the big club, but they really belonged in Rochester.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to last year and the year before that as a Sabre, he has a grand total of 6G-28A-34P in 141 games and 2,988 minutes of ice time, meaning he is averaging almost over 21 minutes of ice time a game.  That is mind bogglingly terrible production for a guy who wasn't all that bad in terms of point production with the Sabres for the most part having 4 straight 40+ point seasons here.

Dahlin has 37 points in 31 games just this year 😂

Edited by matter2003
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, K-9 said:

Risto would kick Reaves’s ass.

No he would not.  Risto is big and strong and nasty with his stick but he never knew how to fight, to actually use fists and trade punches.  
 

Reaves would win on and off the ice.  Reaves actually knows how to fight with fists,  Risto was expected to play defense, and he could hit hard, but he did not fight with his fists.  

Edited by Pimlach
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Do we really care at this point?  I hope Rasmus enjoys his $ and lives a long and happy life.  That he makes Philly worse, all the better.

 

The cherry on top is that the Flyers management signed him to that contract just this past off-season in spite of all the evidence because their management team is obsessed with big, physical guys; whether or not they can play the game well was immaterial.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe 6 years ago my Mom won a Risto jersey in a charity auction. Not game worn, just a nice replica, white with classic logo.  Was a perfect fit for me and I'm her Sabres-loving son...so I got it. 

2023: Wear this in public, or not?

My thinking is it needs to hibernate until Risto is retired a few years, the Sabres have won a Cup or two, and we can look back at those awful days and laugh. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Do we really care at this point?  I hope Rasmus enjoys his $ and lives a long and happy life.  That he makes Philly worse, all the better.

 

Well I understand Liger’s point.  A certain segment of Sabres fans, on this forum included, were adamant about Risto being good, valuable, serviceable, etc.  They wouldn’t shut up about it.  All they could do is point to hits or points, disregarding what was staring everyone right in the face. He’s not good at hockey. He’s a himbo.  No idea what he’s doing out there.  See Casey Mittlestadt.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Marvin said:

His tale is an object lesson in the usefulness of analytics over bromides like "but he gets points" and "but he hits people."  Points and hits are not useless, but the can be overwhelmed by other factors in evaluating a player.

I have always wondered how much Ristolainen, Zadorov, and Girgensons were hurt by The Tank.  They were better than guys on the Sabres at the time, so Nolan felt he needed them on the big club, but they really belonged in Rochester.

All of them suffered by being on the Sabres too early. 
the Sabres failed them as much as they failed the Sabres 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pimlach said:

No he would not.  Risto is big and strong and nasty with his stick but he never knew how to fight, to actually use fists and trade punches.  
 

Reaves would win on and off the ice.  Reaves actually knows how to fight with fists,  Risto was expected to play defense, and he could hit hard, but he did not fight with his fists.  

It’s called sarcasm.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pi2000 said:

I've been a critic of his since day one.   

He's bad, always has been.

I, for one, feel vindicated. 

That said another former Sabrespace darling, Samson Reinhart, continues to be a minus player, even on a stacked Florida squad.   

Making $6.5m he ranks 367th in cost per point... 24 points in 33 games, barely a 60pt pace.   

Is that worth $6.5m?  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, pi2000 said:

That said another former Sabrespace darling, Samson Reinhart, continues to be a minus player, even on a stacked Florida squad.   

Making $6.5m he ranks 367th in cost per point... 24 points in 33 games, barely a 60pt pace.   

Is that worth $6.5m?  

 

Reinhart has not been good, but a lot of Panthers are playing worse than last year.  Florida's real problem is that ownership and/or their GM over-reacted to the playoffs loss last year.  I am not convinced that they have the right coach either.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Marvin said:

Reinhart has not been good, but a lot of Panthers are playing worse than last year.  Florida's real problem is that ownership and/or their GM over-reacted to the playoffs loss last year.  I am not convinced that they have the right coach either.

I said last year that big trade they made with Huberdeau would not work out well for the Panthers and I was right.

Edited by matter2003
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, pi2000 said:

That said another former Sabrespace darling, Samson Reinhart, continues to be a minus player, even on a stacked Florida squad.   

Making $6.5m he ranks 367th in cost per point... 24 points in 33 games, barely a 60pt pace.   

Is that worth $6.5m?  

 

Probably 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...