Curt Posted September 27, 2022 Report Share Posted September 27, 2022 2 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: I could be wrong about this, but if he retired, the Sabres do not have to pay him his contract and he can work wherever he wants. The money against the cap for the Sabres is only on paper. They aren't actually paying him at all. Sabres are actually paying him. However, most of his salary is reimbursed by an insurance policy. At least that’s what I recall. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FogBat Posted September 27, 2022 Report Share Posted September 27, 2022 8 hours ago, Doohickie said: Do you have friends? Well played, my friend. Well played. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerreaultForever Posted September 27, 2022 Report Share Posted September 27, 2022 9 hours ago, Curt said: Sabres are actually paying him. However, most of his salary is reimbursed by an insurance policy. At least that’s what I recall. So what you're saying is a player still gets paid his salary AFTER he retires? That doesn't sound right or make sense, but it's the NHL CBA so I guess anything's possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPie Posted September 27, 2022 Report Share Posted September 27, 2022 (edited) 50 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: So what you're saying is a player still gets paid his salary AFTER he retires? That doesn't sound right or make sense, but it's the NHL CBA so I guess anything's possible. He's not retired, he's on LTIR. If he did retire, it's possible it would have cap implications (for Dallas) depending on how the contract was structured. I don't know the details, but in broad strokes if a team played games with front-loading the contract (see: Buffalo's contract with Ehrhoff) to get around the cap, but the player retires during the course of the contract, there are cap penalties for the team that benefited from the cap circumvention. Edited September 27, 2022 by MattPie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curt Posted September 27, 2022 Report Share Posted September 27, 2022 1 hour ago, PerreaultForever said: So what you're saying is a player still gets paid his salary AFTER he retires? That doesn't sound right or make sense, but it's the NHL CBA so I guess anything's possible. He is not retired though. He is unable to play due to injury. Injured players still get paid and their contracts still count against the cap. Retired players do not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerreaultForever Posted September 27, 2022 Report Share Posted September 27, 2022 3 hours ago, Curt said: He is not retired though. He is unable to play due to injury. Injured players still get paid and their contracts still count against the cap. Retired players do not. Ya got it. I read that he'd retired so I had assumed he had retired rather than stay on LTIR so that he could take that job. The Jim Nill "further review" thing cleared it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashsabre Posted September 27, 2022 Report Share Posted September 27, 2022 If they want to give the Sabres Robertson we will gladly send Bishop back😀 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted September 29, 2022 Report Share Posted September 29, 2022 On 9/27/2022 at 6:33 PM, Flashsabre said: If they want to give the Sabres Robertson we will gladly send Bishop back😀 I proposed that already in my last reply....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.