apuszczalowski Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 5 hours ago, Scottysabres said: One name, 2 yrs left on current contract, expensive but proven worthy. Marc Andre Fluery I just read from a 'hockey rumors' site that the Sabres may have a deal being worked out for him.habe no idea if the site is reliable, but it's one of those rumors that could make sense. Says it would be a big deal with picks and prospects and Vegas would need to retain salary. Would also make sense if Ullmark is expected to be out for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottysabres Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 Just now, apuszczalowski said: I just read from a 'hockey rumors' site that the Sabres may have a deal being worked out for him.habe no idea if the site is reliable, but it's one of those rumors that could make sense. Says it would be a big deal with picks and prospects and Vegas would need to retain salary. Would also make sense if Ullmark is expected to be out for a while. Have no idea, but, earlier this past fall TSN was talking about Vegas wanting to move him. If he's available I don't know now, but he's definitely an upgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 38 minutes ago, Scottysabres said: Have no idea, but, earlier this past fall TSN was talking about Vegas wanting to move him. If he's available I don't know now, but he's definitely an upgrade. It was always widely speculated that they were going to move him, but sounded like no one would take him without Vegas retaining salary, and the whole reason for moving him was to save cap space. When he was in Pittsburgh I always though of him as 'overrated', but he has looked good in Vegas. There aren't many that i would view as a downgrade to Hutton and I don't think Ullmark is going to be anything more then a very good backup/1b type. Fleury/Ullmark Tandem would be pretty good 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 Be nice to get him for 50% retained and a 4th for a 3rd from Buffalo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabremike Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 1 hour ago, Ducky said: Be nice to get him for 50% retained and a 4th for a 3rd from Buffalo. The price just skyrocketed because they know now they have us by the nads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 Him means Fleury for all the people scrolling through multiple posts of vague references to "him" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claude Balls Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 20 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Him means Fleury for all the people scrolling through multiple posts of vague references to "him" Theo Fleury? 🙃 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rakish Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 2 hours ago, LGR4GM said: Him means Fleury for all the people scrolling through multiple posts of vague references to "him" In a week it'll be 'Him' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerreaultForever Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 So we think all we need is a goalie and it'll be worth sending off a bunch of picks and prospects to get him? Well.........I suppose it would depend on the picks and the prospects Our cupboard isn't exactly overflowing so the idea scares me in terms of the future. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimlach Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: So we think all we need is a goalie and it'll be worth sending off a bunch of picks and prospects to get him? Well.........I suppose it would depend on the picks and the prospects Our cupboard isn't exactly overflowing so the idea scares me in terms of the future. Picks are expendable except for the number 1. I would hate to lose prospects for a goalie that will be gone in 2 years. Edited January 20, 2021 by Pimlach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerreaultForever Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 Pretty sure Vegas held on to Fleury with the idea of waiting for a team to come calling desperate for a goalie so that the price would be high. Not going to feel good if we give up Peterka or Johnson and if we give them Cozens I'm out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Pretty sure Vegas held on to Fleury with the idea of waiting for a team to come calling desperate for a goalie so that the price would be high. Not going to feel good if we give up Peterka or Johnson and if we give them Cozens I'm out. Vegas couldn't get a team to take Fleury and a 2nd for free, which is why they ended up moving Schmidt for only a 3rd instead. Edited January 20, 2021 by dudacek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 1 hour ago, PerreaultForever said: Pretty sure Vegas held on to Fleury with the idea of waiting for a team to come calling desperate for a goalie so that the price would be high. Not going to feel good if we give up Peterka or Johnson and if we give them Cozens I'm out. lol, no one is giving up a top prospect like Peterka and it is laughable to name Cozens. Fleury is a 36 year old goalie with a 7 mil cap hit for 2 seasons, he's worth a later round pick and that is if Vegas retains half his salary. Worth something like a 3rd rounder. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IKnowPhysics Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 Are we positive 2019-2020 Marc-Andre Fleury provides an upgrade worthy of spending both assets to acquire and significant cap space? Ullmark: 17-14-3; 0.915; 2.69GAA, $2.6M, UFA after this year Hutton: 12-14-4; 0.898; 3.18GAA (6-8-0, 0.901 post-eye surgery), $2.75M, UFA after this year Fleury: 27-16-5; 0.905; 2.77GAA, $7M, UFA after next year Fleury had a lower SV% and higher GAA behind a winning team than Ullmark had behind us. Over 71 games, VGK allowed 209G, BUF allowed 215G; VGK scored 224G; BUF scored 193G- it doesn't appear on paper that Fleury makes the difference between these two teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 At this point in his career, Fleury is probably worst than Linus and better than Carter. At his salary, the idea of acquiring him expecting a better team is a reach. However, if either of our current goalies (or god forbid both) is going to be out, by all means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 Any possibility Joisey would part w/ Dell relatively cheaply? Or would they hold out for something real to part w/ him and keep Wedgewood as their backup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted January 20, 2021 Report Share Posted January 20, 2021 NHL fines the Capitals 100k for violating the leagues COVID Protocols Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted January 21, 2021 Report Share Posted January 21, 2021 40 minutes ago, Brawndo said: NHL fines the Capitals 100k for violating the leagues COVID Protocols So I was right about them not locking the vodka cabinet? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shootica Posted January 21, 2021 Report Share Posted January 21, 2021 (edited) Don't mind this. Don't mind this at all. Edited January 21, 2021 by Shootica Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted January 21, 2021 Report Share Posted January 21, 2021 2 minutes ago, Shootica said: Don't mind this. Don't mind this at all. Would be a serious kick in the crotch to have Johansson give up 5 to their 3rd-6th lines twice in 3 days. Really hoping Ullmark's concerns are waning (and the reasons for the concerns are alliviated) & we get 2 great games out of him this weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shootica Posted January 21, 2021 Report Share Posted January 21, 2021 Meanwhile, our old friend Jimmy Vesey is causing a stir up in Leafland. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamboni Posted January 21, 2021 Report Share Posted January 21, 2021 11 minutes ago, Shootica said: Meanwhile, our old friend Jimmy Vesey is causing a stir up in Leafland. Meh ... it will be one of his 10 goals of the year. Good for Jimmy. Moving on ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted January 21, 2021 Report Share Posted January 21, 2021 2 hours ago, Zamboni said: Meh ... it will be one of his 10 goals of the year. Good for Jimmy. Moving on ... 10 goals on his own net? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curt Posted January 21, 2021 Report Share Posted January 21, 2021 1 minute ago, Thorny said: 10 goals on his own net? lol Someone wasn’t paying attention in class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted January 21, 2021 Report Share Posted January 21, 2021 10 minutes ago, Curt said: Someone wasn’t paying attention in class. Did you ever get those dumb tests where they'd be like: "Read all the instructions before starting" and then hand you the test. Then at the end of a contrived, lengthy list of instructions at the top of the page, the last bullet point was like - "DO NOT ACTUALLY DO THE TEST!". And everyone who didn't read the instructions before starting failed? Classic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts