Jump to content

OK folks, let's step it up. If you could get a Lindros-like haul for EICHEL, would you?


Eleven

OK folks, let's step it up. If you could get a Lindros-like haul for EICHEL, would you?  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. OK folks, let's step it up. If you could get a Lindros-like haul for EICHEL, would you?

    • Yes
      10
    • No
      15


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Neo said:

I think Joe Sakic was a fantastic hockey player.   One of my all time favorites.  I would mention him and Forsberg in the same sentence.  One game, I take Forsberg.   If I lost the coin flip and got Sakic, I’d not lose a minute’s sleep.  Two greats.

Doesn't Sakic lead the list of all-time playoff OT goals? Sakic was a bigger one-game player. If clutch exists, no one was more clutch. I still take Sakic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Thorny said:

Doesn't Sakic lead the list of all-time playoff OT goals? Sakic was a bigger one-game player. If clutch exists, no one was more clutch. I still take Sakic. 

You know, you could be exactly right with your decision.   I love Sakic.   We are discussing gemstones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Thorny said:

Doesn't Sakic lead the list of all-time playoff OT goals? Sakic was a bigger one-game player. If clutch exists, no one was more clutch. I still take Sakic. 

He also is one off the record for goals in a post season with I think 18

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, #freejame said:

Please explain this. Joe Sakic is considered by most one of the best centers of all time. He’s 8th all-time in points, possesses the great wrist shot ever, and along with Yzerman is arguably the greatest leader of all time. Joe Sakic is a hockey treasure whereas Eric Lindros is a hockey what if. Forsberg did neat things, but he’s not Joe Sakic, not even close. 

My opinion is largely what Neo says, based on Foppa’s warrior mentality.

Joe was more durable and therefore has the better career numbers. Peter was as skilled, but also had the physical game Joe lacked,

To counter @Thornys 96 stats, in 02 Forsberg 27 to Sakic 19. Their playoff PPG is similar, their regular season PPG is similar. Statements like “Joe was the heart and soul” when an equally compelling case could be made for Peter fed my “media creation” comment, when combined with my perception that Canadians think Joe is better while Swedes think Peter is better.

Edited by dudacek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Neo said:

You know, you could be exactly right with your decision.   I love Sakic.   We are discussing gemstones.

You also forget I'm biased because of that huge goal he scored in the 2002 Olympics, gold medal game vs USA ?

2 minutes ago, dudacek said:

My opinion is largely what Neo says, based on Foppa’s warrior mentality.

Joe was more durable and therefore has the better career numbers. Peter was as skilled, but also had the physical game Joe lacked,

To counter @Thornys 96 stats, in 02 Forsberg 27 to Sakic 19. Their playoff PPG is similar, their regular season PPG is similar. Statements like “Joe was the heart and soul” when an equally compelling case could be made for Peter fed my “media creation” comment, when combined with my perception that Canadians think Joe is better while Swedes think Peter is better.

Not really, Sakic was the captain for a reason. There's weight on that bone, whereas the media creation comment I don't think is fair. Forsberg IS underrated, but the rub is that Sakic was, too. 

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Thorny said:

You also forget I'm biased because of that huge goal he scored in the 2002 Olympics, gold medal game vs USA ?

I, too, love that goal!  Sakic was much more of a “favorite” of mine.

Edited by Neo
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Thorny said:

Not really, Sakic was the captain for a reason. 

I’ll give you that, but it’s two reasons actually.

Sakic was older, and was the lone star of a bad team, named Captain before Forsberg arrived .

Also, the NHL in that era was notably xenophobic against Euro captains.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dudacek said:

I’ll give you that, but it’s two reasons actually.

Sakic was older, and was the lone star of a bad team, named Captain before Forsberg arrived .

Also, the NHL in that era was notably xenophobic against Euro captains.

That's fair. I think I just took issue with the wording of your original statement: "Sakic over Forsberg was Canadian media/fandom creation IMO, just like Roy or Brodeur over Dom."

I'm sure some Canadian bias fed in, but you worded that too absolutely. A valid argument can be made that Sakic was better, full stop, it doesn't require a Canadian/Canadian media bias. 

Those lists that had Toews ahead of Malkin - THAT'S Canadian bias. 

Edited by Thorny
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, I love Joe Sakic; he’s one of the all-time greats.

From the point of view of a player that matched my personal aesthetic of the way the game should be played, only Bobby Orr exceeded Forsberg.

(And to be clear, I’m not saying Forsberg’s the second best player of all time)

Edited by dudacek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dudacek said:

Look, I love Joe Sakic; he’s one of the all-time greats.

From the point of view of a player that matched my personal aesthetic of the way the game should be played, only Bobby Orr exceeded Forsberg.

(And to be clear, I’m not saying he’s the second best player of all time)

And I love Forsberg. People are probably aware I love Sid, and Forsberg is the closest stylistic comparable, to me. I've long compared the two. Legs like tree trunks. Oh, the power. 

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a side note, I don't think that 2000-2001 Avs team gets enough credit in "all-time teams" talk. 

They won the cup against a near-dynastic Devils team, WITHOUT Peter the great playing the majority of the playoffs. 

Sakic, Forsberg, Tanguay, Drury, Hejduk, Blake, Bourque, Roy...

The '01-'02 Red Wings are frequently in that convo and that Avs team more less took them down the previous year. 

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Thorny said:

Bob Cole's call makes it. "They're gonna get a break here, and it's gonna be Joooooe Sakiccc.......SCORES! Gggggeeeeeeeeo! Sakic!"

I love all of Bob's calls, but that was one for the ages.

Of all the players that I have watched in my 50 years of watching the game I would pick Joe at #3.  Orr would be a clear #1 followed by Mario and then Joe.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...