Jump to content

GDT: 11/19/19 Minnesota @ Buffalo, 7 p.m. EST


SwampD

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Randall Flagg said:

This is nonsense. My most sought after offseason names were Anthony Cirelli and Brett Connolly. Burakovsky was up there too. You can trade for and afford all of these guys just by not adding the dead cap we added two offseasons ago, and giving up stuff we gave up for Sheary, Vesey, and Montour/Miller, while not having to sit one of those guys every night. I'm not guaranteeing a team like this would be a good team, but we're not asking to go sign Bergeron and then trade for Huberdeau and Point. This team was not some inevitability that Eichel and co just can't pull their weight with to make good, it's been a car crash unfolding in real time, being called every step of the way.

We already have a first line capable of, over an entire season, getting a goal for/against ratio in line with playoff teams. Eichel with Skinner do this. They outscored their opponents enough in their time together last year for this distinction, even including all their minutes together when Skinner couldn't score and the team collapsed. The next step is getting things right behind them. We have made this incredibly hard on ourselves. We had a Selke caliber player ready to go, and dumped him for three bad players, 7 mil in cap that we were lucky to cut in half, and draft picks 3 years out. Now we're kind of re-stuck in a talent hole that was always going to be incredibly difficult to climb out of, which is why my first two courses of action this past summer, that I posted over and over about, were

a.) offer sheets
b.) relentlessly searching, not for a high paid stud, but for someone that hasn't had a chance to break out yet, because they'd be cheap. The caveat of this route is that you have to guess right about the player blossoming in a new, more prominent role. My pick was Anthony, but he was just an example. 

This was the only realistic way to bulking up our NHL talent to a mass comparable with other successful teams. Other lateral moves would leave us hurting the same way, just in different areas. 

There has been nobody more consistent about this picture of the team over the last three years than True or I, and we have not been unrealistic in its description or proposed solutions. We don't have the talent mass, whether Eichel can "lift" the team or not. It isn't there, and there isn't magic character dust that can add it. We were right that Krueger wasn't going to bring the dust. It's on Jason, and it's been on Jason for years. 

I hope you get your way next summer so we can have a good old-fashioned science experiment. If the team still isn't any better, you'll have to look at the top-end talent, which is not nearly consistent enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JBot failure began when he traded ROR and had a foolish plan to replace him.  He was a dead man walking as soon as he did that.  I said that as soon as it happened.  Mitts is reaching bust territory.  Instead of helping the offense, he trades non stop for defenseman.  JBot is clearly not the answer.  Expect RK to move into the FO, find a new GM and Coach next year.  Rinse repeat until you find something that works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, PASabreFan said:

I hope you get your way next summer so we can have a good old-fashioned science experiment. If the team still isn't any better, you'll have to look at the top-end talent, which is not nearly consistent enough.

The good thing with putting that experiment into place is that, with several more good players added, that "top-end talent" will be a larger group, and therefore much more likely to find consistency, as a group, because of the depth of talent available to rely on. 

You just aren't going to be able to score 82 points in a season without a reasonable amount of consistency. Jack's already done it. 

We need a group of players all plugging each others holes. Ya, I said it. 

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, PASabreFan said:

I hope you get your way next summer so we can have a good old-fashioned science experiment. If the team still isn't any better, you'll have to look at the top-end talent, which is not nearly consistent enough.

If we're doing science, can you define consistency, and show me how other stars have shown it, controlling for the strength of their own rosters? And how, controlling for those variables, ours are demonstrably worse?

Was Matthews more consistent during last year's successful Leafs campaign, when he went about 14 games without a goal, and played worse hockey in that stretch than I've ever seen from Jack? Nobody heard about it, because the Leafs team kept winning. 

Was MacKinnon's 4th year, in which the Avs finished with the worst ever record for a non-expansion team, more consistent under these parameters? Did his consistency also improve by having a team around him capable of taking the focus off of himself, rather than having Rodrigues, Lazar, and Gilmour on all the other lines combined, or the worst forward in the NHL at 2C for about 50 games last season? Or was it MacK himself pulling everyone up by his own bootstraps?

How does Tyler Seguin compare?

I'll give you that Jack is no McDavid, and he's no Crosby either. How about Stamkos? From what I've read of Lightning fans over the years, we don't really want Jack to be Stamkos. 

This is just the least compelling take in the world for me, honestly. Jack's last season with Skinner on any reasonably built team gets that team into the playoffs, end of story. Jack didn't even start to take off last year until the streak was well over - he, Jeff, and Sam went on an absolute tear during the 5 game losing streak after, taking it into January, and we lost every step of the way because of factors outside their control, factors that were so obviously going to be there from a lens before the season started, factors so obviously not fixed this offseason and rearing their heads right now. It's not about Jack's consistency. I mean look at this:
Eichel.thumb.PNG.443ef37ff21a1c9d82936b09f83f8a08.PNG

This is what Jack did starting as soon as the streak ended. This span lasted 31 days and ended when he got injured. This is pacing for the second highest scoring Sabre season ever. This is dragging his team on his back. You know what our record was in this stretch? We won FOUR of those 13 games. These are the games in which we watched our depth scoring put up astoundingly limited production, the likes of which is happening right now as well. You wanna see why I was so furious in those emails I was sending to you last Christmas time. That was ***** it. That team deserved help they were never going to get. You don't tell me that performance after that streak doesn't deserve a ***** shot.

Then after about 7 games where he was clearly not himself with that injury, he went on a stretch of 20 games with a 95 point pace, starting with that Calgary OT winner and ending in that crippling Edmonton game where he outplayed and outscored McDavid and softies in goal killed a 2 goal third period lead. The team won 7 of those 20 games. He was better in each of these stretches than when the team was winning (he only had TWO goals 25 games into the season!!) and it meant ***** all for the record because of everything happening around him. 

It doesn't hold up, man.

Edited by Randall Flagg
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Curt said:

Skinner has 8 goals in 21 games

Unsure of the underlying tone of your post, but 31 goals is pretty good, and that's his current pace. His pace per 82 before coming to Buffalo was 29. 

Skinner also falls into the "not an issue" category, to me. He's still what we traded for, a 30 goal scorer, who would score 40 with Jack. But they don't want him to do that anymore, because. 

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Thorny said:

Unsure of the underlying tone of your post, but 31 goals is pretty good, and that's his current pace. His pace per 82 before coming to Buffalo was 29. 

 

6 minutes ago, Randall Flagg said:

Welcome to having a goal scoring specialist in the NHL

My point was that it’s silly of PA to cherry pick stats, like 2 goals in his last 11, which honestly isn’t even alarming.  8 in 21 is just as true.

Players never perform at a nice steady, even point production.  It fluctuates based on dozens of factors.quality of competition, linemates, injuries, coaching tactics........

Jack, Sam and Jeff (and their 29 combined goals, out of teams’ 59 total goals, that’s half folks!) are not the reason that the team isn’t winning!  It’s because Mitts, Sheary, Larsson, Okposo, Girgensons, Sobotka, Rodrigues, Vesey have a combined 11 goals.  8 players, 137 total games played, 11 goals.

Jack, Jeff and Sam are the only 3 guys on this team who are scoring and anyone who says the team is losing because they aren’t doing enough needs to take a long hard look at the rest of the forwards.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Curt said:

Skinner has 8 goals in 21 games

And the Sabres are barely out of the playoffs a quarter of the way into the season and it's already time for I told you so's, Krueger is no better than Housley, Botterill can't construct a lineup... Why? Some are clearly weighing the last 10 games more heavily than the first 10.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PASabreFan said:

And the Sabres are barely out of the playoffs a quarter of the way into the season and it's already time for I told you so's, Krueger is no better than Housley, Botterill can't construct a lineup... Why? Some are clearly weighing the last 10 games more heavily than the first 10.

Haven’t posted much about Ralph, but re: Botterill, from my perspective it’s 2 seasons, and the last 10, vs the first 10 of this season. 

My narrative (bias is dangerous - when it’s not an admitted bias) is also informed by the fact that I am more readily able to put more stock in the recent losses than the early wins because I perceived Botterill’s offseason to be, while not without it’s bright spots, a failure relative to what the overwhelming consensus was in terms of the issues that needed to be addressed. 

Could still be wrong. They could turn it around. 

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PASabreFan said:

And the Sabres are barely out of the playoffs a quarter of the way into the season and it's already time for I told you so's, Krueger is no better than Housley, Botterill can't construct a lineup... Why? Some are clearly weighing the last 10 games more heavily than the first 10.

I honestly am not sure what you are getting at?  And what is has to do with Skinner?

Coming into the season, many were concerned about the forward depth and those concerns are looking to be warranted.  Coaching is still a bit of an open question I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Curt said:

I honestly am not sure what you are getting at?  And what is has to do with Skinner?

Coming into the season, many were concerned about the forward depth and those concerns are looking to be warranted.  Coaching is still a bit of an open question I think.

I can’t speak for @PASabreFan but that won’t stop me: Probably that we are extrapolating Skinner’s entire total over 82, yet not the Sabres point total, based on how much focus we are placing on the recent stretch. 

Skinner is a 31 goal scorer this year, so the Sabres are a 90 point team based on the same extrapolation. 

- - - 

It’s a fair point, I just struggle putting as much faith in the Sabres pulling that off considering recent results, whereas with Skinner, proof is in the pudding. 

Edited by Thorny
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Thorny said:

I can’t speak for @PASabreFan but that won’t stop me: Probably that we are extrapolating Skinner’s entire total over 82, yet not the Sabres point total, based on how much focus we are placing on the recent stretch. 

Ah, ok, fair enough.

I don’t think Buffalo is going to sink to a bottom 3 finish or anything, and I’m not shocked by how they’ve performed this season. I’m not happy but I also don’t think it’s some revelation that this team will be lucky to make the playoffs.  I predicted 82-85 points before the season and I think I’ll stick with that for now.

Mostly I’m unhappy that in 3 straight games against bad teams, Buffalo scored only 6 goals, all of them the direct result of Eichel’s individual talent.  Can this team get some scoring please!

Edited by Curt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Randall Flagg said:

I didn't really think tonight would be the night I broke but why not, they broke everyone else too

Your post was great, and cathartic in some sense, if only to see it all laid out in one go. 

The one point I disagree with definitely (saying something, considering the length (at least on mobile)) was right at the end, and also in this quoted post: I don’t think the fan base is broken. To paraphrase Dumbledore: the fact we feel so much pain is proof that we are alive and whole. 

Maybe we are broken in the emo sense, but not in any real way. If the Sabres ever do figure it out, it’ll be that much sweeter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...