Jump to content

Jeff Skinner - Highest and Best Use?


GASabresIUFAN

Recommended Posts

The Sabres laid out heavy cash to keep Skinner after his great 3/4 season as Jack's trigger man.  Now it seems like the dynamic duo is about to be separated by HCRK.  Is this really the highest and best use of this player?  Will this lead to us getting even close to $9 mill worth or value from him.  Where should he be utilized on the PP?  

Right now HCRK seems to have him playing on the 2nd line but the 1st PP.  Admittedly I would place him on the 1st line with Jack and the 2nd PP because I don't think his passing is good enough for the top PP.  

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, darksabre said:

This certainly seems like a lot of hand-wringing over nothing 

Why?  Skinner does a good job creating his own opportunity but he never succeeded as he did last year until he played with a top flight center like Eichel. 

Thus removing him Eichel maybe reducing him to what he was in Carolina.  If that was the plan why are we paying him top line money? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Why?  Skinner does a good job creating his own opportunity but he never succeeded as he did last year until he played with a top flight center like Eichel. 

Thus removing him Eichel maybe reducing him to what he was in Carolina.  If that was the plan why are we paying him top line money? 

It's preseason my dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

The Sabres laid out heavy cash to keep Skinner after his great 3/4 season as Jack's trigger man.  Now it seems like the dynamic duo is about to be separated by HCRK.  Is this really the highest and best use of this player?  Will this lead to us getting even close to $9 mill worth or value from him.  Where should he be utilized on the PP?  

Right now HCRK seems to have him playing on the 2nd line but the 1st PP.  Admittedly I would place him on the 1st line with Jack and the 2nd PP because I don't think his passing is good enough for the top PP.  

Thoughts?

The goal shouldn't be getting the "best Skinner.". It should be getting the most wins. 

And if Olofsson-Eichel-Reinhart can produce the way it has in limited action, a strong case can be made to keep them together providing Skinner can stay in the 30's with Johansson as his pivot.

I'm on record as saying I believe Skinner fits best on the 2nd PP, but if he does end up split from Eichel, he almost has to go on the 1st PP to make sure he doesn't end up hating coming in to work. 

Edited by Taro T
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Skinner is best suited to play with Eichel OR Reinhart, our best primary passers.  I dislike the Eichel-Reinhart duo anyway, as neither ever wants to shoot, and Reinhart takes a backseat when Eichel is out there.  I think the 'misuse' of Skinner will be resolved when Eichel and Reinhart get split up.

 

But that's assuming that Johannson can't pass the puck, or Rodrigues can't make plays.  Skinner excels at scoring on what I'd call 'broken' plays, and Rodrigues is really good at making weird those things happen on the ice.  I'm interested to see how that duo works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, triumph_communes said:

I think Skinner is best suited to play with Eichel OR Reinhart, our best primary passers.  I dislike the Eichel-Reinhart duo anyway, as neither ever wants to shoot, and Reinhart takes a backseat when Eichel is out there.  I think the 'misuse' of Skinner will be resolved when Eichel and Reinhart get split up.

 

But that's assuming that Johannson can't pass the puck, or Rodrigues can't make plays.  Skinner excels at scoring on what I'd call 'broken' plays, and Rodrigues is really good at making weird those things happen on the ice.  I'm interested to see how that duo works out.

Jack Eichel was 5th overall in the NHL in shots last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, triumph_communes said:

I think Skinner is best suited to play with Eichel OR Reinhart, our best primary passers.  I dislike the Eichel-Reinhart duo anyway, as neither ever wants to shoot, and Reinhart takes a backseat when Eichel is out there.  I think the 'misuse' of Skinner will be resolved when Eichel and Reinhart get split up.

 

But that's assuming that Johannson can't pass the puck, or Rodrigues can't make plays.  Skinner excels at scoring on what I'd call 'broken' plays, and Rodrigues is really good at making weird those things happen on the ice.  I'm interested to see how that duo works out.

I think this has more weight. I would put Reinhart with either Skinner or Olofsson and then give them a center. Sam can drive the line and feed the shooter. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Eichel-Skinner-Reinhart is not only the best line the Sabres can ice, it has the potential to be a top five line in the NHL.  This line and strong goaltending drove a badly-coached and talent-poor team to a 10 game winning streak last season.

Eichel's playmaking optimizes Skinner's scoring.  Reinhart's play-making optimizes Eichel's scoring.  Reinhart ensures that the team gets value from their two highest-paid players.

If the GM builds a reliable, NHL-quality 2nd line to support these guys, they could lead the team to the playoffs.  As a first line, they are that good.

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jad1 said:

The Eichel-Skinner-Reinhart is not only the best line the Sabres can ice, it has the potential to be a top five line in the NHL.  This line and strong goaltending drove a badly-coached and talent-poor team to a 10 game winning streak last season.

Eichel's playmaking optimizes Skinner's scoring.  Reinhart's play-making optimizes Eichel's scoring.  Reinhart ensures that the team gets value from their two highest-paid players.

If the GM builds a reliable, NHL-quality 2nd line to support these guys, they could lead the team to the playoffs.  As a first line, they are that good.

I agree, but unfortunately the bolded is pretty far from being a reality right now.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have zero problem with pairing MoJo with a goal scorer.  He was brought in to be a 2nd line offense creator.  The question is do you put your best scorer (Skinner) with your 3rd best playmaker or do your leave him with your best playmaker (Eichel).

FYI: I’d argue that Reinhart is our second best playmaker and maybe our 4th best goal scorer.  Goal-ofsson could be our second best scorer already.  

Jack’s shootout % is way to low to call him 3nd.

Edited by GASabresIUFAN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is this even a question after previous season i wonder,

We didnt even have a 2nd line last season, speaking of consistency. 

Jack is a playmaker, he needs a sniper and that could be Victor, time will tell but ill say it again, we could already see the chemistry in end of last season

Imo we need a strong 2nd line and who else could up those odds for that happening other than Jeff (?)

Let Jeff settle on 2nd line with the right tools and we might just for once in a long time have two strong lines

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...