Jump to content

The Krueger Crux? "Not thinking out there"


PASabreFan

Recommended Posts

Meh. I’m gonna not have strong negative Nancy opinions or unbridled enthusiasm with what RK is or will be doing or saying. I’m gonna let this season unfold and see what I see. I gave Housley a full season before I had a strong opinion on him. Wanted to give things time. I’ll do the same with RK. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Zamboni said:

Meh. I’m gonna not have strong negative Nancy opinions or unbridled enthusiasm with what RK is or will be doing or saying. I’m gonna let this season unfold and see what I see. I gave Housley a full season before I had a strong opinion on him. Wanted to give things time. I’ll do the same with RK. 

Sensible approach.  I think objective fans can agree, though, that the odds of him being a hidden gem of a coach are improbable at best and probably highly unlikely.

No need to discuss it now.  It will unfold in front of us soon enough.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Thorny said:

Indeed. He sounds like the magic man. 

He is fantastic at managing a team.  He went to England and really turned a nothing side into a very well run EPL team.  That most often does not lead to a championship, as the EPL is the most notorious league for having championships bought, most recently with Middle East oil money.

I think that he was brought in for a bigger role, but the coach was the available position and might as well have him turn around the players first and then move on to running the team as President.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Krueger Crux? "Not thinking out there"

How about:  The Krueger Hoax? "No thinking in here"

F...me.  As if the lack of doing anything to help scoring all off-season wasn't enough, we're being asked to buy into a gamble of a coach.  And we get Vesey - Eichel - Sheary as a first line in the first preseason game?  Just no.  NO.  Not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ... said:

The Krueger Crux? "Not thinking out there"

How about:  The Krueger Hoax? "No thinking in here"

F...me.  As if the lack of doing anything to help scoring all off-season wasn't enough, we're being asked to buy into a gamble of a coach.  And we get Vesey - Eichel - Sheary as a first line in the first preseason game?  Just no.  NO.  Not good.

You are overreacting to be honest. The off-season comment I get but it is literally preseason game #1. They could put Eli and Sobotka with Eichel and I wouldn't think much of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LGR4GM said:

You are overreacting to be honest. The off-season comment I get but it is literally preseason game #1. They could put Eli and Sobotka with Eichel and I wouldn't think much of it. 

It illustrates a thinking pattern.  I don't like the pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RK is gonna throw a lot of weird combos out there for the majority of the preseason. ALL coaches do every year. For the Sabres, Housley did it, Bylsma did it, Nolan did it, Ruff did it etc ...

The combos will change from period to period some games. 

This concept is nothing odd, weird, wrong or outside the box.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A pattern demonstrated here is the lack of observing past performance. 

I also think this could be a result of RK and Botterill communicating - but then Botterill would be ignoring past results.

I don't like Sheary playing with Eichel, period.  Sheary is not a top-line guy.  He's not even a second-line guy.

I can see experimenting with one of Vesey or, I guess, Sheary, on the top line for a...A...preseason game, but we need goals and we need our goal scorers to tune to and lock in with each other.  This is just playing, toying.  There's a certain lack of seriousness to this, it seems to me.

YMMV.

 

Just now, Zamboni said:

RK is gonna throw a lot of weird combos out there for the majority of the preseason. ALL coaches do every year. For the Sabres, Housley did it, Bylsma did it, Nolan did it, Ruff did it etc ...

The combos will change from period to period some games. 

This concept is nothing odd, weird, wrong or outside the box.

Is that how it works? That's nutty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the whole "clean slate" thing.  We still have Steve Smith and Botterill.  We have an analytics department.  There is a past and history with these players.  As I said, this looks like tinkering far more than a serious consideration of the data that's already available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or he’s trying to see if either of these two candidates have some chemistry with Jack, because Jack will likely have at least one new winger this year?

42 minutes ago, ... said:

It's the whole "clean slate" thing.  We still have Steve Smith and Botterill.  We have an analytics department.  There is a past and history with these players.  As I said, this looks like tinkering far more than a serious consideration of the data that's already available.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh.  Early preseason lines mean very little, if anything.  The wealth gets spread around to see who might have the skills to play “up a level”.  There are only so many forwards that you can put a guy with the see if he can keep up.

 I’ll be more concerned if it is still a thing in the last 2 preseason games and the last week of preseason practices.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zamboni said:

RK is gonna throw a lot of weird combos out there for the majority of the preseason. ALL coaches do every year. For the Sabres, Housley did it, Bylsma did it, Nolan did it, Ruff did it etc ...

The combos will change from period to period some games. 

This concept is nothing odd, weird, wrong or outside the box.

I seem to recall the Skinner - Eichel - Pominville top line being a thing REALLY early last year. That Jimmy/Sheary/Eichel has been a line for 3 practices and now a game, means something to me. The season is two weeks away, some of these lines and pairings are probably meant to build chemistry among players that will in fact start the year together. 

https://www.nhl.com/sabres/news/sharpen-up-september-22-2018/c-300320634

There ya go. Our top line to start the regular season last year started our first preseason game together.

Edited by Thorny
Edit: That was our 2nd preseason game with Jack. Can’t seem to find the pairings for preseason game 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thorny said:

I seem to recall the Skinner - Eichel - Pominville top line being a thing REALLY early last year. That Jimmy/Sheary/Eichel has been a line for 3 practices and now a game, means something to me. The season is two weeks away, some of these lines and pairings are probably meant to build chemistry among players that will in fact start the year together. 

https://www.nhl.com/sabres/news/sharpen-up-september-22-2018/c-300320634

There ya go. Our top line to start the regular season last year started our first preseason game together.

Strictly as an FYI, for the 1st practice last year Eichel was centering Skinner and Okposo; Berglund was between Nylander & Bailey; Larsson centered Olofsson & Pekar; and Criscuolo, Cornel, Glotov, & Wilson rounded out Group A.

Mittelstadt centered Sheary & Pominville; Sobotka centered Smith & Thompson; Asplund, Rodrigues, & Baptiste were together; and Girgensons, Malone, O'Regan, & Randell rounded out that groupings lines.

Reinhart was still waiting on a contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Taro T said:

Strictly as an FYI, for the 1st practice last year Eichel was centering Skinner and Okposo; Berglund was between Nylander & Bailey; Larsson centered Olofsson & Pekar; and Criscuolo, Cornel, Glotov, & Wilson rounded out Group A.

Mittelstadt centered Sheary & Pominville; Sobotka centered Smith & Thompson; Asplund, Rodrigues, & Baptiste were together; and Girgensons, Malone, O'Regan, & Randell rounded out that groupings lines.

Reinhart was still waiting on a contract.

Ya, caught that Pominville didn’t get there till preseason game 2 with my edit. Regardless, one of Eichel’s wingers was set day one of camp. And the other was there by his second preseason game. 

This bodes well for one of Vesey and Sheary being there and potentially both. The “camp lines mean nothing” idea is greatly exaggerated.  

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Thorny said:

Ya, caught that Pominville didn’t get there till preseason game 2 with my edit. Regardless, one of Eichel’s wingers was set day one of camp. And the other was there by his second preseason game. 

This bodes well for one of Vesey and Sheary being there and potentially both. The “camp lines mean nothing” idea is greatly exaggerated.  

Yeah.  Have to believe thisis more of an audition for both he and Sheary to see if there's chemistry with Eichel rather than simply to see how they skate "with a veteran."  Would guess that if either/ both falter we'll see Olofsson get a shot there (and possibly, shudder, Thompson) as they try to find a way to let both of the top 2 wings play on line 2 creating a semblance of a 2nd line or even catch lightning in a bottle and have 1 of those 2 with Johansson provide effective wings for the 2nd line making the 3rd li ne better than it realistically should be.

2 thoughts on that. 1 catching lightning in a bottle isn't a strategy.

And 2 Eichel is comfortable enough w/ both Skinner & Reinhart that they should be effective from day 1 should Krueger put one or both back onto Eichel's line after having thrown everything else imaginable against the wall.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dudacek said:

If Sheary Eichel Vesey becomes a thing that lasts, what does it need to do to be considered a success?

Combine for 70-80 goals?

The above, plus the middle six scoring significantly more than last year?

Win more games? A lot more?

Only if they're winning games is that a success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

Should call this the overreaction thread. Let's see where they are next Monday. I bet lines will change a lot. 

Who’s overreacting? 

I’ve already illustrated that half of Jack’s wingers were the same day one of camp last year as they were regular season game 1, and both his wingers from preseason game 2 lined up to start the season with him. 

There’s a HIGH likelihood one of Vesey and Sheary is there and a fair chance it’s both. At least worthy of discussion and not a random overreaction. 

Edited by Thorny
  • Thanks (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...