Jump to content

Per Botterill: Sabres have relieved Phil Housley of his Coaching Duties


Brawndo

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said:

Could be, but if JBot was planning to fire him at the end of the year surely he didn't suddenly change his mind on his own in a few days or a week or whatever time that staff needs?

Not sure what your point is.  The staff (office administrators most likely, but possibly as high as VP of Media Relations) that set things like this up were not in that "inner circle" so were under the impression that there would be a standard end-of-year presser. 

Looking at the team staff directory, my guess is that no one outside of this list knew anything about the firing:

Kim & Terry

General Manager Jason Botterill

Assistant General Manager/Rochester Americans General Manager Randy Sexton

Assistant General Manager Steve Greeley

Vice President of Hockey Administration Mark Jakubowski

EVP & General Counsel, PSE Gregg Brandon

VP of Legal Affairs David S. Zygaj

EVP & General Counsel, PSE Gregg Brandon

Human Resources Manager David McNall

No one on the media relations side would have any inkling about the firing.

 

Edited by Doohickie
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TrueBlueGED said:

I think he was staying anyway.

Why hasn’t he signed then?  I don’t think it’s automatic he stays at all. Obviously they haven’t come close to an agreement or it would have been done already. I’d say 50-50 at best he comes back. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Eleven said:

Please, no.His body of work is telling.  Not until he had an all-star team was he successful.

Quennville previously made the playoffs and won playoff rounds with Colorado and St. Louis.  What’s your definition of success?

Edited by Curtisp5286
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Zamboni said:

Yes! And THAT to me is “total revamping” not 3-5 players. Which is something 29 teams do yearly.

Again, agree to disagree. 

I think we're arguing the same side of the point.  I said 3-5 players was a "minor tweak."  The post I quoted called it revamping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Housley should have realized that he had issues with team defense and created a system that the players could buy in to so that they could compete every night and at least have a chance to win every game. Look at the Islanders. They lost Tavares and because of the system coach Totts put in the players bought in and have made the playoffs. Nobody thought they would be better especially when you lose a player of Tavares caliber. I’m tired of hearing Phil only had a few quality nhl players. Give me a break. All these players besides the rookies have been around for awhile. Good coaches can adjust to what they have to work with. This coaching staff sucked and failed to get the most out of the players. They needed a coach that is tough on his players. To me he seemed soft.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Billznut said:

Why hasn’t he signed then?  I don’t think it’s automatic he stays at all. Obviously they haven’t come close to an agreement or it would have been done already. I’d say 50-50 at best he comes back. 

A lot of players don't sign new contracts in February and still stay in the same place. This isn't unusual. I don't think it's automatic he stays, but I'm not using the calendar to cause panic for myself either. We're an attractive spot for him to be. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, darksabre said:

I feel like the last 4 seasons have been an exercise in extremes. We went from Bylsma who was absolutely choking this team to death with a play to not lose system, to Housley who somehow opened up every single hole in this team so much that all they could do was lose. 

Maybe we can get something in the middle this time. 

 

I'm glad you're back. Well-rested and killing it.

 

1 hour ago, Eleven said:

The wheels were coming off in December, FFS.  If Botterill thought Housley was the reason why, he should have acted sooner.

Botterill didn't want to fire Housley. .500 hockey for a month, after a 10-gam winning streak with a mediocre team doesn't get you fired either.

It was the utter collapse in February. By then, Botterill was better off playing out the string and considering his options.

***

I doubt Q comes here. But if he did, I expect a big rebound next year.

Not overly excited about him though because retread cup winners rarely recapture what made them great.

More excited about a guy with a resume like Q had when he took over the Hawks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dudacek said:

 

I'm glad you're back. Well-rested and killing it.

 

Botterill didn't want to fire Housley. .500 hockey for a month, after a 10-gam winning streak with a mediocre team doesn't get you fired either.

It was the utter collapse in February. By then, Botterill was better off playing out the string and considering his options.

***

I doubt Q comes here. But if he did, I expect a big rebound next year.

Not overly excited about him though because retread cup winners rarely recapture what made them great.

More excited about a guy with a resume like Q had when he took over the Hawks.

I definitely understand this, and I'd usually be in the same spot. One of the big reasons I'm not is because winning in Chicago isn't the totality of his resume. He was a winner long before Chicago residents remembered they had a hockey team, even if he didn't have a Cup at that point. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, SabresBillsFan said:

Housley should have realized that he had issues with team defense and created a system that the players could buy in to so that they could compete every night and at least have a chance to win every game. Look at the Islanders. They lost Tavares and because of the system coach Totts put in the players bought in and have made the playoffs. Nobody thought they would be better especially when you lose a player of Tavares caliber. I’m tired of hearing Phil only had a few quality nhl players. Give me a break. All these players besides the rookies have been around for awhile. Good coaches can adjust to what they have to work with. This coaching staff sucked and failed to get the most out of the players. They needed a coach that is tough on his players. To me he seemed soft.

I agree.  The defense top six is made up of 3 first rounders (all drafted in the top 10), and 3 second rounders (Scandella, McCabe, and Montour). It's hard to imagine Botterill acquiring better talent than is on the ice right now.

For example, Botterill paid a big price for Montour, and the defense actually got worse after the aquisition.

The defense has a lot of bad habits in their own zone and maybe the team needs a dinosaur like Ruff or Trotz for a few seasons to drill fundamentals into the defensemen's heads.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TrueBlueGED said:

I definitely understand this, and I'd usually be in the same spot. One of the big reasons I'm not is because winning in Chicago isn't the totality of his resume. He was a winner long before Chicago residents remembered they had a hockey team, even if he didn't have a Cup at that point. 

Oh, he’s a good coach and seems exactly the type to fix what ailed this team this year.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...