Jump to content

GDT: NY Rangers @ Buffalo Sabres, 2/15/2019 @ 7:00 PM ET


Doohickie

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, jame said:

Yea remember all the Hart trophies Tavares won over Crosby, Malkin, Kane, Ovie, Perry....

But this post points towards exactly what I'm saying. I'm not arguing that Jack WILL win the award. The Hart generally just goes to the best player, anyways. If that's your argument, that's fine. But I made it clear I was arguing based under the ACTUAL definition of the award, which no one seems to do for some reason, and the fact you don't want to read the specifications of my posts renders the whole dialogue needlessly frustrating. 

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Eleven said:

I would like it if you would reconsider your tone.

Sadly, maybe even pathetically, I've been a member of this community for fourteen and a half years.

The people to whom you are responding are my friends.  Some of them, I have met in real life; some, not.  Most of them were there for me when I went through the worst thing I ever could have imagined.  It certainly transcended sports.

You have an utter disregard for politeness and a complete disrespect for anyone other than you, from what I can tell from your limited time here.

I don't care if you want to attack me.  Go ahead.  As above, I've suffered worse.  But please stop being disrespectful to my friends.

I thank you in advance.

You're one to talk. Own it and stop judging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jame said:

Yea remember all the Hart trophies Tavares won over Crosby, Malkin, Kane, Ovie, Perry....

your false insertion of the term “relative” did not go unnoticed. Clever, but wrong.

The award is not "most valuable". It's most valuable "TO HIS TEAM". The relativity, compared to the other guys on said team, and towards what others are providing to THEIR teams, is built in. 

I honestly don't think you were aware that the award is for the value a player provides specifically to his team. Relativity in this case isn't wrong, it's necessary.

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Thorny said:

But this post points towards exactly what I'm saying. I'm not arguing that Jack WILL win the award. The Hart generally just goes to the best player, anyways. If that's your argument, that's fine. But I made it clear I was arguing based under the ACTUAL definition of the award, which no one seems to do for some reason, and the fact you don't want to read the specifications of my posts renders the whole dialogue needlessly frustrating. 

The definition does not say “relative” to their team... that’s a definition you invented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Thorny said:

The award is not "most valuable". It's most valuable "TO HIS TEAM'. The relativity, compared to the other guys on said team, and towards what others are providing to THEIR teams, is built in. 

I honestly don't think you were aware that the award is for the value a player provides specifically to his team. Relativity in this case isn't wrong, it's necessary.

I’m certain you don’t know the definition of relative 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...