Jump to content

TRADE: Sabres acquire Jeff Skinner


Hoss

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Huckleberry said:

I think Carolina was with their backs against the wall on Skinner, they said they wanted to trade him.

Skinner supposed to have turned down the Kings, and maybe a few others, basically they took what they could get.

https://twitter.com/EASPORTSNHL/status/1025165676418236416/photo/1

I think it's worth it to post the whole thing here...

 

Quote
#NHL19Verified account @EASPORTSNHL
FollowFollow @EASPORTSNHL
More

When you have trade difficulty set to 'easy'. #NHL19

Djods_BU4AAe2y6.jpg
4:45 PM - 2 Aug 2018
 
 

And then it was brutally retweeted by the Sabres official account.

Edited by IKnowPhysics
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ripper said:

To those out there

 that hate Skinner --- why?

He always seemed to play well against us.  And +/- aside which is not entirely his fault, I respect his game.

Maybe this is why? I also think the concussions may turn people off. Think about it....allot of people hate Mardhand and Brady but that doesn't mean there any worse a player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MakeSabresGrr8Again said:

Maybe this is why? I also think the concussions may turn people off. Think about it....allot of people hate Mardhand and Brady but that doesn't mean there any worse a player. 

Ok, I get it, thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Ripper said:

To those out there

 that hate Skinner --- why?

He always seemed to play well against us.  And +/- aside which is not entirely his fault, I respect his game.

In a Canes forum, a fan said that Skinner isn't a defensive liability, he's a defensive black hole.  So, yeah, his +/- is pretty much entirely on him.

And I don't care.  The Sabres have some good young talent and decent experience.  Their biggest problem recently is scoring.  I want a finisher.  I want Evander Kane's offensive zone presence without his locker room presence.  Skinner gives us that, but lines will have to be constructed such that Skinner's not expected to have a lot of defensive responsibility.

From reading the Carolina side of it though, Skinner got protected minutes when he broke into the league, but didn't have a complete enough game to earn top line minutes.  There was a lot of butting heads with coaches.  That was why he told them he wouldn't re-sign with the Canes.  Maybe playing for an offensive-minded coach will bring a different perspective.  Maybe getting traded will shake him up a little, give him some perspective, and he'll at least try to play some defense.

Even if he doesn't, the last time the Sabres made it to conference finals it was with Kotalik, Vanek and Afenigenov playing wing, none of whom played defense for beans, but they could finish.  I want that.  Skinner gives us that.

Edited by Doohickie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ripper said:

To those out there

 that hate Skinner --- why?

He always seemed to play well against us.  And +/- aside which is not entirely his fault, I respect his game.

 

1 hour ago, MakeSabresGrr8Again said:

Maybe this is why? I also think the concussions may turn people off. Think about it....allot of people hate Mardhand and Brady but that doesn't mean there any worse a player. 

There's also the diving.  Which always drove me nuts.  But eh, a new uniform can change one's outlook on a player.  
(As long as it's not Doug Gilmour.  Seriously, #### that guy)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed a lot of people are disappointed to see Cliff Pu traded. But Jeff Skinner has scored over 200 goals in the NHL. I loved Pu's potential and think Carolina eventually will see a good return on this trade, but this was a no brainer for the Sabres imo. Sabres have to start getting closer to winning and changing that culture in that locker room with all those talented kids there, and i think it's easier to trade guys like Pu since the Sabres 4 first round picks in the next two years and also are covering the college UFA map pretty well, signing guys like CJ Smith and Andrew Oglevie, both of whom the Sabres seem high on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This trade has the potential to be a unicorn.  Depending on Skinner's performance and contract extension, this trade is in the realm of being the type of old school ripoff that a franchise looks back on and asks "how the did we pull that off?" The type of trade that you just don't see much anymore, either because CBA or because pro scouting.  The ceiling on this trade is ludicrously in our favor.

When we acquired Danny Briere, we gave up Chris Gratton, who had 44 points in 66 games that year.  Gratton was a higher price than Cliff Pu.  Now I'm not saying Skinner will put up 95 points like Briere, but when Briere came to Buffalo, he wasn't quite yet the proven goal scorer that Jeff Skinner is right now, and we were able to acquire him only spending Cliff Pu and picks.

When we talk about rebuilding a franchise and having to do it through the draft, we talk about it that way because a) we know that we could never reliably depend on other teams giving us large asymmetric advantages in trades and b) we know the CBA has mostly leveled the economic playing field, clamped down on player retention, and reduced the ability to consistently make big additions via free agency.  This trade has the potential to break that way of thinking: it could be so asymmetric, it ends up considerably augmenting the home-grown talent, so much so that we may look back on the tank as only part of the rebuild.

https://www.tsn.ca/statistically-speaking-skinner-a-gift-for-sabres-1.1152382

Quote

 

Skinner, 26, is a first-line scoring winger who hasn’t necessarily had the best support in Carolina.

He has 89 goals over the past three seasons, 74 at even strength, tied for 12th and seventh, respectively, over that time frame. He's a three-time 30-goal scorer.

He’s an elite shot generator, recording 19 shot attempts per 60 minutes of 5-on-5 play over the past three seasons. That also ranks seventh in the league. When he was on the ice last season, the Hurricanes created high-quality chances, yet somehow he finished with an on-ice shooting percentage of 6.3%, well below his career mark of 7.9%. The prime time to deal for a scorer is when they are coming off a season of low percentages, so that already looks good for the Sabres.

Skinner had concussion problems earlier in his career, but he's been healthy lately, missing a total of three games over the past three seasons.

Last season in Carolina, Derek Ryan was Skinner’s most frequent centre; the two seasons before that it was Victor Rask. They’re fine NHL players, but it’s possible that Skinner could be even more productive alongside a more skilled pivot.

 

Since joining the league in 2010, he ranks 20th overall in total goals scored and 10th overall (4th among LWs) in even strength goals scored.  Jeff Skinner is an elite goal scorer that is now a Buffalo Sabre playing with elite playmakers.

Edited by IKnowPhysics
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I like about him is that he goes to the greasy areas.  Lots of jam plays and finding rebounds.  He also has a set of hands to... and man he has speed and good balance on his skates.  We will see about how he does getting back on D.  But he gives Sabres a legit break out option.  One we hopped Baptiste or Bailey would turn into.  Hoping Baptiste can learn from him...  Between Skinner and Sheary, finally some real speed with hands and noses for the net on the wings.   If KO can rejuvenate, Sabres may actually score some goals this year and will definitely open up space for Jack, Sam and Mitts.

11 minutes ago, GoPuckYourself said:

I've been hoping for a Skinner trade for some time, been mentioning it in many of the speculation forums on here, I love this deal for Buffalo, they just got a ton faster and Eichel has a legit goal scorer with Skinner.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously JBotto has an agenda against OHL players but I kind of hate the thought of doing what EXGMTM was balsted for...giving young prospects for older established players that are only here for a year or two (Skinner will be gone next summer for sure...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, nfreeman said:

 

Got it a link on the Kings item?  

Not too many guys say no to LA but yes to Buffalo.  Maybe it’s a Dahlin butterfly effect.

 

 

 

https://world.hockeyfeed.com/nhl-news/breaking-skinner-rejects-trade

Only thing I could find for now about him rejecting a few trades.    Every board I read suggests he had a very limited number of teams he wanted to go to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...